11 February 2009

Processing Film, Take 2

So I finally finished another roll of film, and this time took it to Japan Camera to get it developed. The 1-day service for processing and printing is $7.99. If you include scanning the pictures to JPEGs on CD it comes to $15 plus tax. It still feels steep.

So when I got the pictures, the prints looked pretty good. But when I checked out the pictures on the CD, something wasn't right. They weren't my pictures! They were somebody's Caribbean vacation pictures. Most of the pictures were taken on some sort of tubing trip down a river. You'd think this wouldn't be disturbing except for the fat bare legs taking up the bottom third of every picture. So I called the store and they said I could come back and swap the CD. Three trips to the mall in 2 days is a bit much.

So I finally got my pictures on CD. They are pretty good. 3090 by 2048 makes good sized 6.3 megapixel images. And there are no flaws: no dirt, no scratches, no dust, no hair. Even better than the negative scans I made at home. Here's a sample:

 
So I'm very satisfied with the quality. Not so satisfied with the price. Oh well. The alternative is unacceptable so I'll have to live with it. Maybe I'll talk to them about their competitor's price and I'll see what they say.

Since they are film scans you can see some film grain. It was a 400-speed film. (To be more specific, it is Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400. My last film was a Kodak Ultra Max 400.) I'm okay with the grain since the picture quality is very good. I had to colour-correct some images. And some others that had bad exposure were lightened in development. That's a bit annoying since I don't think it improved the image.

10 February 2009

New 35mm DX lens

Nikon announced yesterday a new lens, the AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G. This is Nikon's first prime lens for the DX format. It is positioned as the new "normal" lens since it has the same field of view as a 50mm lens on FX (use that 1.5 factor). I think I might have gotten this instead of the AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D that I did get recently. But then again I might not have, since it is 75% more expensive ($280 vs. $160).